Home
Systemic sustainability: the ultimate frontier
Yet black is greener than
green
War: The elephant in the
sustainability room
A convenient tale
PDCs to advance
reductions beyond NDCs
COP21:
Historic, historical or hysterical?
COP20: CBDR or ECBDR?
Doha: Gateway or Giveaway?
An epic battle in the
wrong war
What it takes to be sustainable
Making the Copenhagen Accord equitable
Post-2012 climate regime: equitable, effective, sufficient?
An equitable and effective climate regime
Are global citizens equal before the Climate Convention?
Decarbonising with renewables? Extremely difficult
Financial crisis and sustainable development |
Financial crisis
and sustainable development
The causes of the financial crisis
The very essential driver of the economy is spending by individual
consumers. And many consumers have been spending more than they earn.
In the US for example, consumer spending in 2007 was 130% of income, up
from 60% in 1982. Overspending was fuelled by easy, unlimited credit
offered by the financial system, with the complacency of regulators and
the government. Credit was financed by real money from abroad, especially
Asia, and "future money" created from the blue through intricate financial
engineering. The US economy enjoyed artificial wealth based on borrowing
that eventually dried up, and future consumer income that may never become
real.
Other countries more or less followed the US financing model. Eastern
Europe and the Baltic are examples of countries that financed consumer
spending through huge credits in hard currency from Austrian, Italian and
Swedish banks. The UK is another example; the only doubt here is whether
they were the actual mastermind or the co-inventor of the overspending
model.
The financial or rather economic crisis is just the most visible side of a
wider global crisis: overconsumption of resources, be it money, air,
water, forests, minerals, etc. Our lifestyle is simply unsustainable, at
the expense of the poor and future generations.
How does economic sustainability relate to sustainable development?
The term "sustainable development" somehow wore out by indiscriminate use
and loose interpretation.
The original definition coined by WCED refers to development that meets
present needs without compromising those of future generations.
The UN 2005 World Summit emphasized on economic development, social
development and environmental protection as the pillars of sustainable
development.
We certainly tend to forget that sustainable development is not only about
natural environment, but also about social environment and sustainable
economy.
The present economic crisis and its savage impact on the world poor makes
evident that there is an increasing gap, instead of convergence, between
rhetoric and reality. Ever Increasing carbon concentrations in the
atmosphere just confirm the gap on the nature's side.
Paraphrasing the title of a famous documentary,
If global warming is an inconvenient
truth,
then what we are doing about it is a convenient tale.
Mhai Selph, March 2009
© 2010 Mhai Selph All rights reserved
|